SpiderAML
Check an address

Address AML check

Paste the recipient address. We'll show the risk and why.

100of 100
Fraud signals in databasesOn a stablecoin issuer's blacklist

Critical risk

The address is sanctioned or linked to a hack, theft or phishing.

0x6551Fb9BE444987F7482012CBf7ea95A1ee8DD0eEthereum
  • Do not send funds to this address.
  • If you already did, keep the transaction hash and contact your exchange or wallet support.
What the score is made of
The final score is the largest of the parts
  • Sanctions lists and risk databases5 signal(s) found100 points
  • Counterparties0 checked, none in risk databases0 points
Serious signals

Confirmed by sources: sanctions, hacks, phishing. This is the main reason for the score.

Hack or theft

Linked to a hack or theft.

  • bZx PrivKey Exploiter 4 (exploit, heist)Found in the Etherscan database: view the address on PolygonScanFlagged on Polygon. The address is the same on every network, so it matters here too.
  • Theft / exploit (SlowMist,BlockSec)source: GoPlus Security
Suspicious activity

User complaints or a flag in open databases.

Issuer freeze

Tether or Circle blacklisted this address. USDT or USDC cannot move to or from it, even if it is empty now.

On a stablecoin issuer's blacklist

Tether or Circle put this address on their blacklist: its USDT or USDC is blocked. The block applies even to an empty address. It is the issuer's decision, not proof of a crime.

Weak signals

Labels from open research and lists, not confirmed. Not a reason to refuse by themselves, but be more careful.

Hack or theft

Linked to a hack or theft.

Connections

None of the recent counterparties carries a risk label.

At a glance
Risk signals
5
Balance, all chains (Zerion, spam tokens excluded)
$0
Addresses screened
0flagged: 0

The score is produced automatically from public data. It is not legal advice and not an accusation: addresses can be listed by mistake. Checked Nov 8, 08:37 AM.

Wrong score? Tell us