SpiderAML

Address AML check

Paste the recipient address. We'll show the risk and why.

0of 100
Contract PEPE

Low risk

The address is not on sanctions lists or in risk databases.

0x6982508145454Ce325dDbE47a25d4ec3d2311933Ethereum
  • Compare the address with the one you were given, character by character.
  • For a large amount, send a small test payment first.
What the score is made of
The final score is the largest of the parts
  • Sanctions lists and risk databasesnot found0 pts
  • Token designautomatic contract score 0/100, 70% of it counts0 pts
Token risks PEPE
Full token analysis
  • Liquidity0/20

    Little money in pools — hard to sell without losses.

  • Open contract code0/20

    Code not published — nothing to review.

  • Owner privileges0/14

    The owner can change the token rules.

  • Market presence0/10

    Whether it trades and has data.

Total: 0 of 64 points → 0/100

  • Exchange wallets are not counted as large holders: they hold coins for many customers.
  • Holder concentration could not be assessed: recent transfers show only a small part of the supply, the rest sits in wallets that have not moved. This factor is not part of the score.
  • Liquidity on centralised exchanges (order books, from CoinGecko) is counted, not only DEX pools.
At a glance
Risk signals
0
Balance, all chains (Zerion, spam tokens excluded)
$321.4Kpast day 3.7%

The score is produced automatically from public data. It is not legal advice and not an accusation: addresses can be listed by mistake. Checked Oct 27, 10:33 PM.

Wrong score? Tell us